Your choices go into the PDF (cover and captions); this bar does not.
Rebalix
Comparison report · official data side by side

AHYX vs ISRM


AHYXAmundi Core MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF Acc
LU3206582846 · Equity · Global
ISRMAmundi Label ISR Actions Monde UCITS ETF Acc
FR001400SDM0 · Equity · Global · Sustainable / ESG
Open the interactive comparison on rebalix.com →

Comparison window: 30 Dec 20253 Sept 2026 (max: from the most recent launch) · currency: 🇪🇺 EUR · inflation: 🇮🇹 Italy · distributions: reinvested where declared⚠ Common window shorter than 12 months: comparable data are scarce and carry no statistical value.

Report produced on 5 September 2026 · data as of the dates shown per section
Sources: official issuer documents (KID, factsheet, declared NAV series and holdings), ESMA register, ECB rates, Eurostat
Public methodology: rebalix.com/en/methodology

Informational document generated by rebalix.com — facts side by side, no recommendations. It does not constitute investment advice or investment research under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). Past performance is not indicative of future results.

RebalixAHYX vs ISRM · report of 5 September 2026

The funds at a glance

From official issuer documents and the ESMA register
AHYXLU3206582846Amundi Core MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF AccEquity · Global
Declared index
MSCI World Net Total Return USD Index
TER
0.12%
Transaction (KID)
0.00%
Fund size
15 mln EUR
Launch
16 Dec 2025
Currency
USD
Replication
Synthetic (swap)
Hedging
No
Holdings
209
Effective 🇮🇹 rate
ISRMFR001400SDM0Amundi Label ISR Actions Monde UCITS ETF AccEquity · Global · Sustainable / ESG
Declared index
MSCI World Net Total Return USD Index
TER
0.20%
Transaction (KID)
0.07%
Fund size
330 mln EUR
Launch
27 Nov 2024
Currency
EUR
Replication
Physical
Hedging
No
Holdings
333
Effective 🇮🇹 rate

Tracking difference — year by year

Fund minus index, from issuer-declared series (complete calendar years). Each measures adherence to its OWN index.
AHYXn/d
not honestly computable
ISRMn/d
2025
+0.80%
Rebalix · AHYX vs ISRMsection 1 of 4
RebalixAHYX vs ISRM · report of 5 September 2026
AHYXAmundi Core MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF Acc · LU3206582846 · Equity · Global
ISRMAmundi Label ISR Actions Monde UCITS ETF Acc · FR001400SDM0 · Equity · Global · Sustainable / ESG

Performance over the period, in euro

From 30 Dec 2025 to 3 Sept 2026 · base 100 · ECB rates, dividends reinvested where declared
In euro (nominal)
10011894115116
In today’s purchasing power (net of Italy inflation)
10011894112113
AHYXISRM
Same scale in both panels: the gap between endpoints is Italian inflation over the period (Eurostat). Volatility stays nominal, as everywhere on the site.

How far they fell — drawdown from peak (nominal)

In euro · distance from the previous peak, day by day, on NAV: for distributing classes it includes ex-dividend drops (slightly deeper than total return)
0%-2%-4%-6%-8%-10%AHYXISRM2026trough AHYX: −6.5% · 30 Mar 2026trough ISRM: −7.5% · 27 Mar 2026
Filled area: AHYX; thin lines: the other funds.
The worst episode, fund by fund
FundMax drawdownTroughRecovery timeUnderwater
AHYX−6.5%30 Mar 202616 days49 days · back to break-even on 15 Apr 2026
ISRM−7.5%27 Mar 202620 days91 days · back to break-even on 16 Apr 2026
"Recovery time" = the climb only: trough to break-even (0%). "Underwater" = decline + recovery: peak to break-even.

Drawdown net of Italy inflation

Same curve in purchasing-power terms: as on the site, drawdown follows the real view (volatility stays nominal, per methodology)
0%-2%-4%-6%-8%-10%AHYXISRM2026trough AHYX: −8.4% · 30 Mar 2026trough ISRM: −9.5% · 27 Mar 2026
In real terms declines are deeper and recoveries slower. Monthly price index (Eurostat), held at the last published value.
Rebalix · AHYX vs ISRMsection 2 of 4
RebalixAHYX vs ISRM · report of 5 September 2026
AHYXAmundi Core MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF Acc · LU3206582846 · Equity · Global
ISRMAmundi Label ISR Actions Monde UCITS ETF Acc · FR001400SDM0 · Equity · Global · Sustainable / ESG

Geographic composition

% of portfolio, from full declared holdings
AHYXISRMUnited States87.5%71.4%Switzerland5.6%1.8%Denmark2.9%0.1%Sweden2.1%1.0%Japan0.0%5.3%

Sector composition

GICS sectors, same sources and dates
AHYXISRMInformation Technology36.4%30.2%Health Care15.0%9.9%Consumer Discretionary13.1%8.4%Industrials10.9%11.6%Financials10.5%17.0%Communication Services7.5%7.9%Consumer Staples2.7%5.4%Real Estate2.0%1.9%

Portfolio overlap

78 common holdings · ticker match on full official portfolios
25%50%75%100%Weight of common holdings in AHYX62.4%Weight of common holdings in ISRM39.3%Truly shared part (duplicated investment)32.3%
How the shared part is computed: for each security held by both funds, only the SMALLER of the two weights counts — a stock at 5% in one fund and 1% in the other overlaps by 1%, not 5%. Summed over all 78 common holdings this gives 32.3%: buying both funds, roughly this share of your money buys the same stocks twice. Matching uses the ISIN of each security, as published by both issuers in their baskets.
Rebalix · AHYX vs ISRMsection 3 of 4
RebalixAHYX vs ISRM · report of 5 September 2026

Full comparison table

"—" = not published by the source, never estimated
AHYXAmundi Core MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF Acc · LU3206582846 · Equity · Global
ISRMAmundi Label ISR Actions Monde UCITS ETF Acc · FR001400SDM0 · Equity · Global · Sustainable / ESG
MetricAHYXISRMNote
Identity
CategoryEquity · GlobalEquity · Global · Sustainable / ESGRebalix engine classification
ReplicationSynthetic (swap)Physicalas declared by the issuer
Currency hedgingNoNosource: class name, factsheet
Income policyaccumulatingaccumulating
Costs
TER0.12%0.20%from the KID
Transaction costs (KID)0.00%0.07%internal
All-in cost0.12%0.27%TER + transaction
Tracking difference (3a)vs its OWN index
Performance in euro (ECB rates)
1 year+24.9%
3 years
5 years
10 years— = series younger than the window
Risk · last 3 years
Volatility (ann.)
Max drawdown
Sharperisk-free = ECB MRO avg
Sortinolike Sharpe, downside only
Italian taxation
Effective capital-gains ratewhite list, current half-year
Documents & exchanges
Listing venues84ESMA register
Borsa Italiana ticker
Indicative cumulative cost: on 10,000 euro over 5 years (stated assumption: 5%/yr growth, cost = TER + transaction) ~76 euro AHYX · ~171 euro ISRM. Broker costs not included.

Disclaimer

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II), investment research, a personal recommendation, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell financial instruments.

Past performance is not indicative of, nor a guarantee of, future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the capital invested. Euro returns are affected by currency fluctuations.

Before any investment decision, read the KID and the Prospectus, available from the issuers. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may change.

Data come from official issuer documents and public registers, following the public methodology at rebalix.com/en/methodology. "—" fields were not published by the source and have not been estimated. Rebalix receives no compensation from the issuers mentioned.

Rebalix · AHYX vs ISRMsection 4 of 4