Your choices go into the PDF (cover and captions); this bar does not.
Rebalix
Comparison report · official data side by side

LCJG vs LCJP


LCJGAmundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
LU1781541682 · Equity · Japan
LCJPAmundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc
LU1781541252 · Equity · Japan
Open the interactive comparison on rebalix.com →

Comparison window: 18 Oct 20188 Sept 2026 (max: from the most recent launch) · currency: 🇪🇺 EUR · inflation: 🇮🇹 Italy · distributions: reinvested where declared

Report produced on 10 September 2026 · data as of the dates shown per section
Sources: official issuer documents (KID, factsheet, declared NAV series and holdings), ESMA register, ECB rates, Eurostat
Public methodology: rebalix.com/en/methodology

Informational document generated by rebalix.com — facts side by side, no recommendations. It does not constitute investment advice or investment research under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). Past performance is not indicative of future results.

RebalixLCJG vs LCJP · report of 10 September 2026

The funds at a glance

From official issuer documents and the ESMA register
LCJGLU1781541682Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF GBP Hedged AccEquity · Japan
Declared index
MSCI Japan Net JPY Index
TER
0.20%
Transaction (KID)
0.20%
Fund size
19 mln EUR
Launch
18 Oct 2018
Currency
GBP
Replication
Physical
Hedging
Yes — in GBP
Holdings
168
Effective 🇮🇹 rate
26.00%
LCJPLU1781541252Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF AccEquity · Japan
Declared index
MSCI Japan Net JPY Index
TER
0.12%
Transaction (KID)
0.12%
Fund size
5.3 mld EUR
Launch
28 Feb 2018
Currency
JPY
Replication
Physical
Hedging
No
Holdings
168
Effective 🇮🇹 rate
26.00%

Tracking difference — year by year

Fund minus index, from issuer-declared series (complete calendar years). Each measures adherence to its OWN index.
LCJG3y avg: −0.70%/anno
2025
−0.39%
2024
−0.73%
2023
−0.97%
2022
−1.64%
2021
−0.27%
2020
−0.51%
LCJP3y avg: −0.11%/anno
2025
−0.12%
2024
−0.10%
2023
−0.12%
2022
−0.15%
2021
−0.16%
2020
−0.21%
Rebalix · LCJG vs LCJPsection 1 of 4
RebalixLCJG vs LCJP · report of 10 September 2026
LCJGAmundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc · LU1781541682 · Equity · Japan
LCJPAmundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc · LU1781541252 · Equity · Japan

Performance over the period, in euro

From 18 Oct 2018 to 8 Sept 2026 · base 100 · ECB rates, dividends reinvested where declared
In euro (nominal)
10033673323205
In today’s purchasing power (net of Italy inflation)
10033673263166
LCJGLCJP
Same scale in both panels: the gap between endpoints is Italian inflation over the period (Eurostat). Volatility stays nominal, as everywhere on the site.

How far they fell — drawdown from peak (nominal)

In euro · distance from the previous peak, day by day, on NAV: for distributing classes it includes ex-dividend drops (slightly deeper than total return)
0%-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%LCJGLCJP20192020202120222023202420252026trough LCJG: −34.1% · 16 Mar 2020trough LCJP: −26.4% · 16 Mar 2020
Filled area: LCJG; thin lines: the other funds.
The worst episode, fund by fund
FundMax drawdownTroughRecovery timeUnderwater
LCJG−34.1%16 Mar 2020298 days392 days · back to break-even on 08 Jan 2021
LCJP−26.4%16 Mar 2020253 days285 days · back to break-even on 24 Nov 2020
"Recovery time" = the climb only: trough to break-even (0%). "Underwater" = decline + recovery: peak to break-even.

Drawdown net of Italy inflation

Same curve in purchasing-power terms: as on the site, drawdown follows the real view (volatility stays nominal, per methodology)
0%-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%LCJGLCJP20192020202120222023202420252026trough LCJG: −35.0% · 16 Mar 2020trough LCJP: −29.4% · 21 Oct 2022
In real terms declines are deeper and recoveries slower. Monthly price index (Eurostat), held at the last published value.
Rebalix · LCJG vs LCJPsection 2 of 4
RebalixLCJG vs LCJP · report of 10 September 2026
LCJGAmundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc · LU1781541682 · Equity · Japan
LCJPAmundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc · LU1781541252 · Equity · Japan

Geographic composition

% of portfolio, from full declared holdings
LCJGLCJPJapan99.9%99.9%

Sector composition

GICS sectors, same sources and dates
LCJGLCJPIndustrials24.3%24.3%Financials19.1%19.1%Information Technology18.0%18.0%Consumer Discretionary15.1%15.1%Communication Services6.7%6.7%Health Care5.4%5.4%Materials3.8%3.8%Consumer Staples3.7%3.7%

Portfolio overlap

168 common holdings · ticker match on full official portfolios
25%50%75%100%Weight of common holdings in LCJG99.9%Weight of common holdings in LCJP99.9%Truly shared part (duplicated investment)99.9%
How the shared part is computed: for each security held by both funds, only the SMALLER of the two weights counts — a stock at 5% in one fund and 1% in the other overlaps by 1%, not 5%. Summed over all 168 common holdings this gives 99.9%: buying both funds, roughly this share of your money buys the same stocks twice. Matching uses the ISIN of each security, as published by both issuers in their baskets.
Rebalix · LCJG vs LCJPsection 3 of 4
RebalixLCJG vs LCJP · report of 10 September 2026

Full comparison table

"—" = not published by the source, never estimated
LCJGAmundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc · LU1781541682 · Equity · Japan
LCJPAmundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc · LU1781541252 · Equity · Japan
MetricLCJGLCJPNote
Identity
CategoryEquity · JapanEquity · JapanRebalix engine classification
ReplicationPhysicalPhysicalas declared by the issuer
Currency hedgingYes — hedged to GBPNosource: class name, factsheet
Income policyaccumulatingaccumulating
Costs
TER0.20%0.12%from the KID
Transaction costs (KID)0.20%0.12%internal
All-in cost0.40%0.24%TER + transaction
Tracking difference (3a)−0.70%−0.11%vs its OWN index
Performance in euro (ECB rates)
1 year+40.4%+30.3%
3 years+104.2%+61.2%
5 years+146.4%+57.8%
10 years— = series younger than the window
Risk · last 3 years
Volatility (ann.)+23.75%+23.05%
Max drawdown−26.53%−25.13%
Sharpe1.040.90risk-free = ECB MRO avg
Sortino1.471.27like Sharpe, downside only
Italian taxation
Effective capital-gains rate26.00%26.00%white list, current half-year
Documents & exchanges
Listing venues9ESMA register
Borsa Italiana tickerLCJP
Indicative cumulative cost: on 10,000 euro over 5 years (stated assumption: 5%/yr growth, cost = TER + transaction) ~253 euro LCJG · ~152 euro LCJP. Broker costs not included.

Disclaimer

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II), investment research, a personal recommendation, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell financial instruments.

Past performance is not indicative of, nor a guarantee of, future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the capital invested. Euro returns are affected by currency fluctuations.

Before any investment decision, read the KID and the Prospectus, available from the issuers. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may change.

Data come from official issuer documents and public registers, following the public methodology at rebalix.com/en/methodology. "—" fields were not published by the source and have not been estimated. Rebalix receives no compensation from the issuers mentioned.

Rebalix · LCJG vs LCJPsection 4 of 4