Your choices go into the PDF (cover and captions); this bar does not.
Rebalix
Comparison report · official data side by side

LUXG vs MLUX


LUXGAmundi Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD Acc
LU1681048713 · Equity · Global · Beni di consumo discrezionali · Thematic
MLUXAmundi PEA Luxe Monde UCITS ETF Acc
FR001400S9V0 · Equity · Global · Lusso · Thematic
Open the interactive comparison on rebalix.com →

Comparison window: 6 Dec 20248 Sept 2026 (max: from the most recent launch) · currency: 🇪🇺 EUR · inflation: 🇮🇹 Italy · distributions: reinvested where declared

Report produced on 10 September 2026 · data as of the dates shown per section
Sources: official issuer documents (KID, factsheet, declared NAV series and holdings), ESMA register, ECB rates, Eurostat
Public methodology: rebalix.com/en/methodology

Informational document generated by rebalix.com — facts side by side, no recommendations. It does not constitute investment advice or investment research under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). Past performance is not indicative of future results.

RebalixLUXG vs MLUX · report of 10 September 2026

The funds at a glance

From official issuer documents and the ESMA register
LUXGLU1681048713Amundi Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD AccEquity · Global · Beni di consumo discrezionali · Thematic
Declared index
S&P Global Luxury Index Net TR
TER
0.25%
Transaction (KID)
0.00%
Fund size
40 mln EUR
Launch
30 Jan 2018
Currency
USD
Replication
Synthetic (swap)
Hedging
No
Holdings
29
Effective 🇮🇹 rate
26.00%
MLUXFR001400S9V0Amundi PEA Luxe Monde UCITS ETF AccEquity · Global · Lusso · Thematic
Declared index
S&P Global Luxury Index Net TR
TER
0.30%
Transaction (KID)
0.00%
Fund size
12 mln EUR
Launch
9 Dec 2024
Currency
EUR
Replication
Synthetic (swap)
Hedging
No
Holdings
39
Effective 🇮🇹 rate

Tracking difference — year by year

Fund minus index, from issuer-declared series (complete calendar years). Each measures adherence to its OWN index.
LUXG3y avg: −0.41%/anno
2025
−0.19%
2024
−0.42%
2023
−0.63%
2022
−0.52%
2021
−0.85%
2020
−0.96%
MLUXn/d
2025
−0.56%
Rebalix · LUXG vs MLUXsection 1 of 4
RebalixLUXG vs MLUX · report of 10 September 2026
LUXGAmundi Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD Acc · LU1681048713 · Equity · Global · Beni di consumo discrezionali · Thematic
MLUXAmundi PEA Luxe Monde UCITS ETF Acc · FR001400S9V0 · Equity · Global · Lusso · Thematic

Performance over the period, in euro

From 6 Dec 2024 to 8 Sept 2026 · base 100 · ECB rates, dividends reinvested where declared
In euro (nominal)
100109779291
In today’s purchasing power (net of Italy inflation)
100109778988
LUXGMLUX
Same scale in both panels: the gap between endpoints is Italian inflation over the period (Eurostat). Volatility stays nominal, as everywhere on the site.

How far they fell — drawdown from peak (nominal)

In euro · distance from the previous peak, day by day, on NAV: for distributing classes it includes ex-dividend drops (slightly deeper than total return)
0%-5%-10%-15%-20%-25%-30%LUXGMLUX20252026trough LUXG: −27.3% · 07 Apr 2025trough MLUX: −26.9% · 07 Apr 2025
Filled area: LUXG; thin lines: the other funds.
The worst episode, fund by fund
FundMax drawdownTroughRecovery timeUnderwater
LUXG−27.3%07 Apr 2025not yet586 days (ongoing)
MLUX−26.9%07 Apr 2025not yet586 days (ongoing)
"Recovery time" = the climb only: trough to break-even (0%). "Underwater" = decline + recovery: peak to break-even.

Drawdown net of Italy inflation

Same curve in purchasing-power terms: as on the site, drawdown follows the real view (volatility stays nominal, per methodology)
0%-5%-10%-15%-20%-25%-30%LUXGMLUX20252026trough LUXG: −28.8% · 07 Apr 2025trough MLUX: −28.4% · 07 Apr 2025
In real terms declines are deeper and recoveries slower. Monthly price index (Eurostat), held at the last published value.
Rebalix · LUXG vs MLUXsection 2 of 4
RebalixLUXG vs MLUX · report of 10 September 2026
LUXGAmundi Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD Acc · LU1681048713 · Equity · Global · Beni di consumo discrezionali · Thematic
MLUXAmundi PEA Luxe Monde UCITS ETF Acc · FR001400S9V0 · Equity · Global · Lusso · Thematic

Geographic composition

% of portfolio, from full declared holdings
LUXGMLUXUnited States101.2%13.7%Germany0.0%50.7%Netherlands0.0%10.6%Belgium0.0%9.4%

Sector composition

GICS sectors, same sources and dates
LUXGMLUXInformation Technology44.4%11.1%Health Care22.5%7.0%Consumer Discretionary13.0%16.7%Consumer Staples11.1%0.3%Communication Services6.0%12.1%Industrials4.0%21.3%

Portfolio overlap

9 common holdings · ticker match on full official portfolios
25%50%75%100%Weight of common holdings in LUXG36.8%Weight of common holdings in MLUX12.6%Truly shared part (duplicated investment)11.4%
How the shared part is computed: for each security held by both funds, only the SMALLER of the two weights counts — a stock at 5% in one fund and 1% in the other overlaps by 1%, not 5%. Summed over all 9 common holdings this gives 11.4%: buying both funds, roughly this share of your money buys the same stocks twice. Matching uses the ISIN of each security, as published by both issuers in their baskets.
Rebalix · LUXG vs MLUXsection 3 of 4
RebalixLUXG vs MLUX · report of 10 September 2026

Full comparison table

"—" = not published by the source, never estimated
LUXGAmundi Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD Acc · LU1681048713 · Equity · Global · Beni di consumo discrezionali · Thematic
MLUXAmundi PEA Luxe Monde UCITS ETF Acc · FR001400S9V0 · Equity · Global · Lusso · Thematic
MetricLUXGMLUXNote
Identity
CategoryEquity · Global · Beni di consumo discrezionali · ThematicEquity · Global · Lusso · ThematicRebalix engine classification
ReplicationSynthetic (swap)Synthetic (swap)as declared by the issuer
Currency hedgingNoNosource: class name, factsheet
Income policyaccumulatingaccumulating
Costs
TER0.25%0.30%from the KID
Transaction costs (KID)0.00%0.00%internal
All-in cost0.25%0.30%TER + transaction
Tracking difference (3a)−0.41%vs its OWN index
Performance in euro (ECB rates)
1 year−6.2%−6.3%
3 years−2.6%
5 years−2.7%
10 years— = series younger than the window
Risk · last 3 years
Volatility (ann.)+19.04%
Max drawdown−23.97%
Sharpe0.01risk-free = ECB MRO avg
Sortino0.02like Sharpe, downside only
Italian taxation
Effective capital-gains rate26.00%white list, current half-year
Documents & exchanges
Listing venues54ESMA register
Borsa Italiana ticker
Indicative cumulative cost: on 10,000 euro over 5 years (stated assumption: 5%/yr growth, cost = TER + transaction) ~159 euro LUXG · ~190 euro MLUX. Broker costs not included.

Disclaimer

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II), investment research, a personal recommendation, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell financial instruments.

Past performance is not indicative of, nor a guarantee of, future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the capital invested. Euro returns are affected by currency fluctuations.

Before any investment decision, read the KID and the Prospectus, available from the issuers. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may change.

Data come from official issuer documents and public registers, following the public methodology at rebalix.com/en/methodology. "—" fields were not published by the source and have not been estimated. Rebalix receives no compensation from the issuers mentioned.

Rebalix · LUXG vs MLUXsection 4 of 4