Your choices go into the PDF (cover and captions); this bar does not.
Rebalix
Comparison report · official data side by side

EQQS vs EQEU


EQQS — Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
IE00BNRQM384 · Equity · United States
EQEU — Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF EUR Hdg Acc
IE00BYVTMS52 · Equity · United States
Open the interactive comparison on rebalix.com →

Comparison window: 22 Mar 2021 → 13 Aug 2026 (max: from the most recent launch) · currency: 🇪🇺 EUR · inflation: 🇮🇹 Italy · distributions: reinvested where declared

Report produced on 20 October 2026 · data as of the dates shown per section
Sources: official issuer documents (KID, factsheet, declared NAV series and holdings), ESMA register, ECB rates, Eurostat
Public methodology: rebalix.com/en/methodology

Informational document generated by rebalix.com — facts side by side, no recommendations. It does not constitute investment advice or investment research under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). Past performance is not indicative of future results.

RebalixEQQS vs EQEU · report of 20 October 2026

The funds at a glance

From official issuer documents and the ESMA register
EQQSIE00BNRQM384Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF AccEquity · United States
Declared index
NASDAQ - 100 Notional NTR Index
TER
0.20%
Transaction (KID)
0.00%
Fund size
3 mld EUR
Launch
22 Mar 2021
Currency
USD
Replication
Synthetic (swap)
Hedging
No
Holdings
260
Effective 🇮🇹 rate
26.00%
EQEUIE00BYVTMS52Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF EUR Hdg AccEquity · United States
Declared index
NASDAQ - 100 Notional NTR Index
TER
0.35%
Transaction (KID)
0.02%
Fund size
16.6 mld EUR
Launch
17 Oct 2017
Currency
EUR
Replication
Physical
Hedging
Yes — in EUR
Holdings
102
Effective 🇮🇹 rate
26.00%

Tracking difference — year by year

Fund minus index, from issuer-declared series (complete calendar years). Each measures adherence to its OWN index.
EQQSn/d
not honestly computable
—
EQEUn/d
hedged class: the published index is unhedged, the gap would measure the exchange rate
—
Rebalix · EQQS vs EQEUsection 1 of 4
RebalixEQQS vs EQEU · report of 20 October 2026
EQQS — Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc · IE00BNRQM384 · Equity · United States
EQEU — Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF EUR Hdg Acc · IE00BYVTMS52 · Equity · United States

Performance over the period, in euro

From 22 Mar 2021 to 13 Aug 2026 · base 100 · ECB rates, dividends reinvested where declared
In euro (nominal)
10024968245206
In today’s purchasing power (net of Italy inflation)
10024968200168
EQQSEQEU
Same scale in both panels: the gap between endpoints is Italian inflation over the period (Eurostat). Volatility stays nominal, as everywhere on the site.

How far they fell — drawdown from peak (nominal)

In euro · distance from the previous peak, day by day, on NAV: for distributing classes it includes ex-dividend drops (slightly deeper than total return)
0%-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%EQQSEQEU20222023202420252026trough EQQS: −31.3% · 28 Dec 2022trough EQEU: −37.9% · 28 Dec 2022
Filled area: EQQS; thin lines: the other funds.
The worst episode, fund by fund
FundMax drawdownTroughRecovery timeUnderwater
EQQS−31.3%28 Dec 2022317 days721 days · back to break-even on 10 Nov 2023
EQEU−37.9%28 Dec 2022406 days810 days · back to break-even on 07 Feb 2024
"Recovery time" = the climb only: trough to break-even (0%). "Underwater" = decline + recovery: peak to break-even.

Drawdown net of Italy inflation

Same curve in purchasing-power terms: as on the site, drawdown follows the real view (volatility stays nominal, per methodology)
0%-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%EQQSEQEU20222023202420252026trough EQQS: −39.1% · 28 Dec 2022trough EQEU: −45.0% · 28 Dec 2022
In real terms declines are deeper and recoveries slower. Monthly price index (Eurostat), held at the last published value.
Rebalix · EQQS vs EQEUsection 2 of 4
RebalixEQQS vs EQEU · report of 20 October 2026
EQQS — Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc · IE00BNRQM384 · Equity · United States
EQEU — Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF EUR Hdg Acc · IE00BYVTMS52 · Equity · United States

Geographic composition

% of portfolio, from full declared holdings
◀ EQQSEQEU ▶

Sector composition

GICS sectors, same sources and dates
◀ EQQSEQEU ▶

Portfolio overlap

47 common holdings · ticker match on full official portfolios
25%50%75%100%Weight of common holdings in EQQS45.0%Weight of common holdings in EQEU75.9%Truly shared part (duplicated investment)37.9%
How the shared part is computed: for each security held by both funds, only the SMALLER of the two weights counts — a stock at 5% in one fund and 1% in the other overlaps by 1%, not 5%. Summed over all 47 common holdings this gives 37.9%: buying both funds, roughly this share of your money buys the same stocks twice. Matching uses the ISIN of each security, as published by both issuers in their baskets.
Rebalix · EQQS vs EQEUsection 3 of 4
RebalixEQQS vs EQEU · report of 20 October 2026

Full comparison table

"—" = not published by the source, never estimated
EQQS — Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc · IE00BNRQM384 · Equity · United States
EQEU — Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF EUR Hdg Acc · IE00BYVTMS52 · Equity · United States
MetricEQQSEQEUNote
Identity
CategoryEquity · United StatesEquity · United StatesRebalix engine classification
ReplicationSynthetic (swap)Physicalas declared by the issuer
Currency hedgingNoYes — hedged to EURsource: class name, factsheet
Income policyaccumulatingaccumulating—
Costs
TER0.20%0.35%as declared by the issuer
Transaction costs (KID)0.00%0.02%internal
All-in cost0.20%0.37%declared annual cost + transaction (KID)
Tracking difference (3a)——vs its OWN index
Performance in euro (ECB rates)
1 year+27.5%+23.0%—
3 years+94.0%+87.7%—
5 years+108.7%+78.3%—
10 years——— = series younger than the window
Risk · last 3 years
Volatility (ann.)+20.55%+20.51%—
Max drawdown−22.85%−22.70%—
Sharpe1.060.95risk-free = ECB MRO avg
Sortino1.561.39like Sharpe, downside only
Italian taxation
Effective capital-gains rate26.00%26.00%white list, current half-year
Documents & exchanges
Listing venues1211ESMA register
Borsa Italiana ticker—EQEU—
Indicative cumulative cost: on 10,000 euro over 5 years (stated assumption: 5%/yr growth, cost = TER + transaction) ~127 euro EQQS · ~234 euro EQEU. Broker costs not included.

Disclaimer

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II), investment research, a personal recommendation, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell financial instruments.

Past performance is not indicative of, nor a guarantee of, future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the capital invested. Euro returns are affected by currency fluctuations.

Before any investment decision, read the KID and the Prospectus, available from the issuers. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may change.

Data come from official issuer documents and public registers, following the public methodology at rebalix.com/en/methodology. "—" fields were not published by the source and have not been estimated. Rebalix receives no compensation from the issuers mentioned.

Rebalix · EQQS vs EQEUsection 4 of 4