Your choices go into the PDF (cover and captions); this bar does not.
Rebalix
Comparison report · official data side by side

SPXS vs IQUA


SPXSInvesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Acc
IE00B3YCGJ38 · Equity · United States · Large cap
IQUAInvesco US Enhanced Equity UCITS ETF Acc
IE0009EGAHL0 · Equity · United States · Large cap
Open the interactive comparison on rebalix.com →

Comparison window: 7 Oct 202513 Aug 2026 (max: from the most recent launch) · currency: 🇪🇺 EUR · inflation: 🇮🇹 Italy · distributions: reinvested where declared⚠ Common window shorter than 12 months: comparable data are scarce and carry no statistical value.

Report produced on 5 September 2026 · data as of the dates shown per section
Sources: official issuer documents (KID, factsheet, declared NAV series and holdings), ESMA register, ECB rates, Eurostat
Public methodology: rebalix.com/en/methodology

Informational document generated by rebalix.com — facts side by side, no recommendations. It does not constitute investment advice or investment research under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). Past performance is not indicative of future results.

RebalixSPXS vs IQUA · report of 5 September 2026

The funds at a glance

From official issuer documents and the ESMA register
SPXSIE00B3YCGJ38Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF AccEquity · United States · Large cap
Declared index
S&P 500® Total Return (Net) Index
TER
0.05%
Transaction (KID)
0.07%
Fund size
50.7 mld EUR
Launch
20 May 2010
Currency
USD
Replication
Synthetic (swap)
Hedging
No
Holdings
566
Effective 🇮🇹 rate
26.00%
IQUAIE0009EGAHL0Invesco US Enhanced Equity UCITS ETF AccEquity · United States · Large cap
Declared index
S&P 500® Total Return (Net) Index
TER
0.16%
Transaction (KID)
0.02%
Fund size
179 mln EUR
Launch
7 Oct 2025
Currency
USD
Replication
Active
Hedging
No
Holdings
259
Effective 🇮🇹 rate
26.00%

Tracking difference — year by year

Fund minus index, from issuer-declared series (complete calendar years). Each measures adherence to its OWN index.
SPXS3y avg: +0.41%/anno
2025
+0.32%
2024
+0.41%
2023
+0.51%
2022
+0.34%
2021
+0.48%
2020
+0.55%
IQUAn/d
not honestly computable
Rebalix · SPXS vs IQUAsection 1 of 4
RebalixSPXS vs IQUA · report of 5 September 2026
SPXSInvesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Acc · IE00B3YCGJ38 · Equity · United States · Large cap
IQUAInvesco US Enhanced Equity UCITS ETF Acc · IE0009EGAHL0 · Equity · United States · Large cap

Performance over the period, in euro

From 7 Oct 2025 to 13 Aug 2026 · base 100 · ECB rates, dividends reinvested where declared
In euro (nominal)
10012295119122
In today’s purchasing power (net of Italy inflation)
10012295116119
SPXSIQUA
Same scale in both panels: the gap between endpoints is Italian inflation over the period (Eurostat). Volatility stays nominal, as everywhere on the site.

How far they fell — drawdown from peak (nominal)

In euro · distance from the previous peak, day by day, on NAV: for distributing classes it includes ex-dividend drops (slightly deeper than total return)
0%-2%-4%-6%-8%-10%SPXSIQUA2026trough SPXS: −7.5% · 30 Mar 2026trough IQUA: −6.5% · 30 Mar 2026
Filled area: SPXS; thin lines: the other funds.
The worst episode, fund by fund
FundMax drawdownTroughRecovery timeUnderwater
SPXS−7.5%30 Mar 202617 days97 days · back to break-even on 16 Apr 2026
IQUA−6.5%30 Mar 202614 days94 days · back to break-even on 13 Apr 2026
"Recovery time" = the climb only: trough to break-even (0%). "Underwater" = decline + recovery: peak to break-even.

Drawdown net of Italy inflation

Same curve in purchasing-power terms: as on the site, drawdown follows the real view (volatility stays nominal, per methodology)
0%-2%-4%-6%-8%-10%SPXSIQUA2026trough SPXS: −9.4% · 30 Mar 2026trough IQUA: −8.5% · 30 Mar 2026
In real terms declines are deeper and recoveries slower. Monthly price index (Eurostat), held at the last published value.
Rebalix · SPXS vs IQUAsection 2 of 4
RebalixSPXS vs IQUA · report of 5 September 2026
SPXSInvesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Acc · IE00B3YCGJ38 · Equity · United States · Large cap
IQUAInvesco US Enhanced Equity UCITS ETF Acc · IE0009EGAHL0 · Equity · United States · Large cap

Geographic composition

% of portfolio, from full declared holdings
SPXSIQUA

Sector composition

GICS sectors, same sources and dates
SPXSIQUA

Portfolio overlap

137 common holdings · ticker match on full official portfolios
25%50%75%100%Weight of common holdings in SPXS77.5%Weight of common holdings in IQUA72.5%Truly shared part (duplicated investment)38.5%
How the shared part is computed: for each security held by both funds, only the SMALLER of the two weights counts — a stock at 5% in one fund and 1% in the other overlaps by 1%, not 5%. Summed over all 137 common holdings this gives 38.5%: buying both funds, roughly this share of your money buys the same stocks twice. Matching uses the ISIN of each security, as published by both issuers in their baskets.
Rebalix · SPXS vs IQUAsection 3 of 4
RebalixSPXS vs IQUA · report of 5 September 2026

Full comparison table

"—" = not published by the source, never estimated
SPXSInvesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Acc · IE00B3YCGJ38 · Equity · United States · Large cap
IQUAInvesco US Enhanced Equity UCITS ETF Acc · IE0009EGAHL0 · Equity · United States · Large cap
MetricSPXSIQUANote
Identity
CategoryEquity · United States · Large capEquity · United States · Large capRebalix engine classification
ReplicationSynthetic (swap)Activeas declared by the issuer
Currency hedgingNoNosource: class name, factsheet
Income policyaccumulatingaccumulating
Costs
TER0.05%0.16%from the KID
Transaction costs (KID)0.07%0.02%internal
All-in cost0.12%0.18%TER + transaction
Tracking difference (3a)+0.41%vs its OWN index
Performance in euro (ECB rates)
1 year+23.1%+20.1%
3 years+72.9%
5 years+90.3%
10 years+303.1%— = series younger than the window
Risk · last 3 years
Volatility (ann.)+14.98%
Max drawdown−18.76%
Sharpe1.17risk-free = ECB MRO avg
Sortino1.72like Sharpe, downside only
Italian taxation
Effective capital-gains rate26.00%26.00%white list, current half-year
Documents & exchanges
Listing venues109ESMA register
Borsa Italiana tickerSPXSIQUA
Indicative cumulative cost: on 10,000 euro over 5 years (stated assumption: 5%/yr growth, cost = TER + transaction) ~76 euro SPXS · ~114 euro IQUA. Broker costs not included.

Disclaimer

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II), investment research, a personal recommendation, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell financial instruments.

Past performance is not indicative of, nor a guarantee of, future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the capital invested. Euro returns are affected by currency fluctuations.

Before any investment decision, read the KID and the Prospectus, available from the issuers. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may change.

Data come from official issuer documents and public registers, following the public methodology at rebalix.com/en/methodology. "—" fields were not published by the source and have not been estimated. Rebalix receives no compensation from the issuers mentioned.

Rebalix · SPXS vs IQUAsection 4 of 4